<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Elegance all it&#8217;s cracked up to be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://icbf.com.au/index.php/2010/01/25/is-elegance-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://icbf.com.au/index.php/2010/01/25/is-elegance-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/</link>
	<description>Changing Brains Since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://icbf.com.au/index.php/2010/01/25/is-elegance-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbf.com.au/?p=118#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Yep, agree completely - and there&#039;s some really interesting stuff regarding what sorts of complexity we can easily parse (for example, physics is a great source of complexity in games, because we can easily parse it).

Need to brush up on my complexity theory - thanks for the pointer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, agree completely &#8211; and there&#8217;s some really interesting stuff regarding what sorts of complexity we can easily parse (for example, physics is a great source of complexity in games, because we can easily parse it).</p>
<p>Need to brush up on my complexity theory &#8211; thanks for the pointer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @thorfi</title>
		<link>http://icbf.com.au/index.php/2010/01/25/is-elegance-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>@thorfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icbf.com.au/?p=118#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Complexity theory (from maths land) talks about the &quot;edge of chaos&quot;.

You can have a system that is &quot;too simple&quot; (leading to boring), or &quot;too complex&quot; (leading to random not-understandable chaos).

Life, and pretty much everything &quot;interesting&quot; exists on the &quot;edge of chaos&quot; - organised enough to clearly have some rules, but *just* complex enough to promote some occasional randomness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complexity theory (from maths land) talks about the &#8220;edge of chaos&#8221;.</p>
<p>You can have a system that is &#8220;too simple&#8221; (leading to boring), or &#8220;too complex&#8221; (leading to random not-understandable chaos).</p>
<p>Life, and pretty much everything &#8220;interesting&#8221; exists on the &#8220;edge of chaos&#8221; &#8211; organised enough to clearly have some rules, but *just* complex enough to promote some occasional randomness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

